Jenkins criticism spurs buyside to enter bank debate
Senior executives from the European investment industry are planning to enter the debate on the future of the banking industry in the wake of criticism from a Bank of England executive that the buyside has sat on the sidelines too long.
Martin Gilbert, chief executive of 
Aberdeen Asset Management, said: “The banks have good lobbying skills 
but asset managers have been pretty shy. I would support a forum where 
we can make our views known to both sides.”  Jenkins said: “I welcome 
Martin Gilbert’s suggestion. I will work with him and like-minded others
 to facilitate such a forum.” 
Richard Saunders, chief executive of
 the Investment Management Association trade body, expressed support: 
“There is a need for much more input from asset managers into the policy
 process around bank reform. Policymakers don’t ask themselves nearly 
often enough how banks can be made attractive to investors. And asset 
managers are sometimes too shy about putting forward a view.”
Saker Nusseibeh, chief executive of 
Hermes Fund Managers, said: “The asset management industry has a moral 
duty to get involved in the debate on bank capitalisation and 
regulation. This is not just about whether it makes banks more 
investible for us: it is wider than that. 
“We are the investment professionals
 who spend our careers analysing banks, we have knowledge and views on 
how they can work better. We should share that, and the regulators and 
politicians should take that into account.”
Lindsay Tomlinson, National 
Association of Pension Funds board member, said: “If such a forum can be
 created, I would most certainly support it.” 
Last week, Hendrik du Toit, chief 
executive of Investec Asset Management, said that managers should be the
 “transparent, modern, accountable face of capitalism”. He was speaking 
at Financial News’ 2012 Awards for Excellence in European Asset 
Management the day after Jenkins had criticised the buyside at the CFA 
UK’s annual chairman’s dinner. Jenkins claimed asset managers were the 
stakeholder group best qualified to shape the outcome of the banking 
reform debate but also the most silent.
Asset management sources confirmed 
that a group of managers had discussed the importance of making banks 
investible with Jenkins last week. A series of equity managers, 
including Neil Woodford of Invesco Perpetual, stopped investing in the 
sector in the 2000s because they could not work out how they were making
 their money.
A hedge fund manager said the main 
priority was to provide certainty: “The regulatory landscape is so 
unclear because of the politicisation of banks. I would put the ball 
decisively back in the far right-hand corner of the regulators’ court 
where they would probably falter and fail to return it.”