Europe's economy.

3. Opposition to the development of Russian energy supplies in the Asia-Pacific region. This resistance is indirect and occurs mainly through domestic lobbyists. His motives are obvious. First, the EU is objectively interested in maintaining the current total evrozavisimosti Russia's energy sector, which is currently physically unable to sell the same gas wherever it may be, except Europe. Secondly, the West and particularly the United States are interested in a strategic containment of the growing economies of China, India and other Asia Pacific countries. The problem of power shortages in these economies, becoming a "global factory" in the global division of labor remains an important factor controlling their development of the powers in control (or seeking to control) force field of global energy policy. According to participants, the U.S. side during an informal coordination of positions failed, first, to make a principled refusal to Russia's side of the pipeline construction in China under the project "East pipeline, secondly - to direct Russia's LNG market for U.S. technology cycle and the U.S. route. 4. "Shift" approach to regional energy producers in Eastern Russia At least most troubling is that Russia's stake in this game is not just a problem of diversification of its own energy policy, but the problem of infrastructure development in Siberia and the Far East and the problems of connectivity and communication of the country. Experts, lobbying for the assimilation of European integration, has openly spoken about "minimizing" burdensome economic infrastructure of Siberia, created in Soviet times as an objective condition "European choice". In the logic of this choice, the alternative to "imperial" policy development "challenging spaces" should be a rotational approach and as a consequence - the international security guarantees Trans-Uralian territories and the international regime to use their resources. Recently, this scenario is beginning to penetrate from the information field in real politics. Siberia and the Far East today "cut off" from the European part of Russia following the example of Kaliningrad. In the course of the delimitation of borders with Kazakhstan, hastily carried out under pressure to the EU, was not even raised the question of the status of the Trans-Siberian station, passing through the territory of Kazakhstan. At the moment, only the good will of President Nazarbayev separates Russia from the "cutting" of the axial artery of communication "visa barriers".